In 2017, Roger Guimerà and Marta Sales-Pardo discovered a cause of cell division, the process driving the growth of living beings. But they couldn’t immediately reveal how they learned the answer. The researchers hadn’t spotted the crucial pattern in their data themselves. Rather, an unpublished invention of theirs — a digital assistant they called the “machine scientist” — had handed it to them. When writing up the result, Guimerà recalls thinking, “We can’t just say we fed it to an algorithm and this is the answer. No reviewer is going to accept that.”
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/kgf-chapter-2-of-madness-2022-online-at-home-for-free/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/kgf-chapter-2-of-madness-full-watch-free/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/free-download-kgf-chapter-2-of-madness-online-at-home/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/kgf-chapter-2-of-madness-online-at-home-mp4-720p/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/kgf-chapter-2-of-madness-2022-online-watch-for-free/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/kgf-chapter-2stream-free-hindi-telegu-movie/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/kgf-chapter-2-watconline/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/123movies-kgf-chapter-2-movie-tv/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/sonic-the-hedgehog-2-2022-online-at-home-for-free/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/sonic-the-hedgehog-2-full-watch-free/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/free-download-sonic-the-hedgehog-2-online-at-home/profile
https://www.bcsda.org.au/profile/sonic-the-hedgehog-2-online-at-home-mp4-720p/profile
https://geany.org/p/UYPv2/
http://cpp.sh/5g44c
https://geany.org/p/KoHka/
http://cpp.sh/3guav
https://rextester.com/JDVXC39860
https://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/b5398fb63c7d5e5b
https://yamcode.com/powerful-machine-scientists-distill-the-laws-of-physics-from-raw-data
https://paste2.org/ng3wJLYc
https://ideone.com/G0FQqH
https://pasteio.com/xojZoecTZRDM
https://paste.tbee-clan.de/dnMQQ
https://controlc.com/b64f129c
https://p.teknik.io/zPAlm
https://apaste.info/qR3U
https://notes.io/qwu4F
https://paiza.io/projects/DaduHyrhxFBolt8QhJI0YA
https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/c005c513-935c-4029-b32c-e6ef43eb277c
http://cpp.sh/5rrtjj
https://bitbin.it/b7aKhzyZ/
https://pastelink.net/j3dlf9jh
https://paste.rs/uho
https://dotnetfiddle.net/bk9J5A
http://allabouturanch.com/forum/topics/powerful-machine-scientists-distill-the-laws-of-physics-from-raw
http://beterhbo.ning.com/forum/topics/powerful-machine-scientists-distill-the-laws-of-physics-from-raw
https://caribbeanfever.com/photo/albums/asfcwef-wefwef
http://playit4ward-sanantonio.ning.com/photo/albums/asfcwe-wefwf
The duo, who are partners in life as well as research, had teamed up with the biophysicist Xavier Trepat of the Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, a former classmate, to identify which factors might trigger cell division. Many biologists believed that division ensues when a cell simply exceeds a certain size, but Trepat suspected there was more to the story. His group specialized in deciphering the nanoscale imprints that herds of cells leave on a soft surface as they jostle for position. Trepat’s team had amassed an exhaustive data set chronicling shapes, forces, and a dozen other cellular characteristics. But testing all the ways these attributes might influence cell division would have taken a lifetime.
Instead, they collaborated with Guimerà and Sales-Pardo to feed the data to the machine scientist. Within minutes it returned a concise equation that predicted when a cell would divide 10 times more accurately than an equation that used only a cell’s size or any other single characteristic. What matters, according to the machine scientist, is the size multiplied by how hard a cell is getting squeezed by its neighbors — a quantity that has units of energy.
“It was able to pick up something that we were not,” said Trepat, who, along with Guimerà, is a member of ICREA, the Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies.
Because the researchers hadn’t yet published anything about the machine scientist, they did a second analysis to cover its tracks. They manually tested hundreds of pairs of variables, “irrespective of … their physical or biological meaning,” as they would later write. By design, this recovered the machine scientist’s answer, which they reported in 2018 in Nature Cell Biology.